Why FP&A Teams Rely on Excel (and Where It Falls Short)
Despite its growing limitations, Excel remains deeply embedded in finance for good reason. It’s fast, widely accessible, and gives users near-total control over their models. In the hands of experienced analysts, Excel can be a powerful engine for building forecasts, running scenarios, and delivering reports. That legacy—and the trust that comes with it—makes it difficult to walk away from completely.
Finance teams continue to rely on Excel for a few key reasons:
Familiarity and accessibility: Nearly every finance professional knows how to use Excel. That lowers training overhead and makes it easy to share models across teams.
Flexible, powerful modeling: Excel can be molded into nearly any planning tool, from revenue models to workforce projections. Its open-ended structure supports creativity and customization.
Speed and control: For quick-turn analyses or last-minute requests, Excel gives analysts the freedom to move fast without waiting on system updates or IT support.
These strengths are real, but they come with tradeoffs. As finance teams are asked to do more—partner across the business, forecast in real time, respond to change—these strengths start to show their limits.
The Limits of Excel for Modern FP&A
As planning grows more dynamic and collaborative, the limitations of spreadsheet-based processes become harder to ignore. For CFOs and teams trying to guide the business with clarity and speed, these limitations are more than frustrating—they're barriers to performance.
Lack of Real-Time Data Integration
Excel isn’t connected to core business systems. Excel files must be exported, reformatted, and manually entered into planning models. The result: outdated inputs, delays in updates, and constant reconciliation work.
Siloed Work and Version Control Issues
With multiple contributors and no centralized version, Excel models often live in personal drives or email threads. This creates confusion around which version is accurate and wastes time aligning stakeholders.
Collaboration Friction and Audit Risk
Excel lacks the built-in controls to manage approvals, track changes, or limit access based on roles. As more users touch a model, the risks of error, miscommunication, and audit failures increase.
Limited Scalability
What works for a single department becomes fragile at the enterprise level. Excel slows down with large datasets, complex logic, or multiple users working simultaneously.
Insight Gaps and Missed Opportunities
Spreadsheets weren’t built to surface trends, flag anomalies, or model rapid what-if scenarios. These blind spots reduce finance’s ability to drive strategic conversations.
FP&A as a Business-Wide Value Driver
Finance is no longer a back-office scorekeeper. FP&A teams are expected to provide forward-looking insight that helps steer the business in real time. This means delivering rolling forecasts, modeling different outcomes, and collaborating seamlessly with partners across HR, sales, and operations.
Transforming into this role with technologies like artificial intelligence and automation are top priority for CFOs and finance leaders. The Workday Global CFO AI Indicator Report found key functions of financial planning at the top of the priority list for AI-led finance transformation, with areas like forecasting, budget decisions, and strategic support across business lines leading the way.